Answer it.
[INSERT IMAGE]
Start with Newton's second law of motion …
∑ F = m a
but do it twice. (Let up and forward be the positive directions.)
| horizontal | vertical | ||||
| ∑ Fx | = | max | ∑ Fy | = | may |
| T sin θ | = | ma | T cos θ − mg | = | 0 |
| T cos θ | = | mg | |||
Divide these two equations.
| T sin θ | = | ma |
| T cos θ | mg |
Simplify using algebra and trig identities.
| tan θ = | a |
| g |
a = g tan θ
Test the equation with a few representative values. A 0° angle indicates no acceleration, since tan 0° = 0; a 45° angle corresponds to a horizontal acceleration of 1 g, since tan 45° = 1; and a 90° angle is impossible, since tan 90° = ∞.
Although the idea of using a pendulum to measure horizontal accelerations is a simple one, there really was no need to make one until people regularly started to move at speeds faster than a fast horse. The first pendulum accelerometer was built by the British mechanical engineer Frederick Lanchester in 1889. A pencil was attached to the pendulum bob so that it could automatically draw an acceleration–time graph on a piece of paper.
Lanchester was interested in the smoothness of braking systems on cars and trains. In particular, he was curious about the cause of the sudden change in motion that happens right before a braking train comes to rest.
It has been remarked that a characteristic feature of brake diagrams is the suddenness of the drop at the instant of stopping. This is a very interesting and important point, inasmuch as it is the cause of the "jerk" nearly always experienced just as a train comes to rest; it was in fact in investigating this jerk in 1888 that the idea of the pendulum accelerometer occurred to the writer. At that time it was currently supposed that the jerk was the effect of the recoil of the buffer springs after stopping; whereas a very little consideration shows that it is in reality sudden change of acceleration [emphasis original] that we recognize physiologically as "jerk," that is df/dt [for some odd reason, he chose to use f for acceleration], and not change in the direction of motion. It suggests itself in fact that the term "jerk " might well be given a scientific meaning and be defined as ds3/dt3.
The suggestion stuck.
Answer it.
Answer it.