- home
- Mechanics
- Kinematics
- Dynamics I: Force
- Energy
- Dynamics II: Momentum
- Rotational Motion
- Planetary Motion
- Periodic Motion
- Fluids
- Thermal Physics
- Heat & Temperature
- Calorimetry
- Heat Transfer
- Thermodynamics
- Waves & Optics
- Wave Phenomena
- Sound
- Physical Optics
- Geometric Optics
- Electricity & Magnetism
- Electrostatics
- Electrostatic Applications
- Electric Current
- DC Circuits
- Magnetostatics
- Magnetodynamics
- AC Circuits
- Electromagnetic Waves
- Modern Physics
- Relativity
- Quanta
- Wave Mechanics
- Nuclear Physics
- Particle Physics
- Appendices
- Units
- Measurement
- Graphs
- Vectors
- Reference
- about
- news
- shop
- contact
- more
-
✚ share
-
Isotopes
Problems
practice
- Write something.
- Write something.
- Write something.
- Write something completely different.
conceptual
- God is in the gaps, as they say.
The discussion highlighted the magic numbers for protons and neutrons (2, 8,
20, 28, 50, 82, 126), but it also mentioned a few gaps in the nuclides. Namely,
there are no stable isotopes with mass number 5 or 8 (numbers that are important
later when we study stellar nucleosynthesis) or atomic number 43 or 61 (technetium
and promethium). Look closely at the graph
of the nuclides and see if you can find any other interesting gaps. (Consider
only elements with atomic numbers below lead Z = 82.)
- Are there any other atomic mass numbers with no stable isotopes (like 5 or 8)?
- What neutron numbers have no stable isotopes?
- What do all of these numbers share in common (or maybe, what do they almost all share in common)?
- Are there any apparently "non-magic numbers"