| v0 = | 25 m/s | v = | v0 + at |
| a = | −2.0 m/s2 | v = | (25 m/s) + (−2.0 m/s2)(3.0 s) |
| Δt = | 3.0 s | v = | 19 m/s |
| v = | ?? | ||
| v0 = | 25 m/s | Δx = | v0t + ½at2 |
| a = | −2.0 m/s2 | Δx = | (25 m/s)(3.0 s) + ½(−2.0 m/s2)(3.0 s)2 |
| Δt = | 3.0 s | Δx = | 66 m |
| Δx = | ?? | ||
| v = | 19 m/s | v2 = | v02 + 2aΔx |
| a = | −8.0 m/s2 | v02 = | v2 − 2aΔx |
| Δx = | 66 m | v02 = | (19 m/s)2 − 2(−8.0 m/s2)(66 m) |
| v0 = | ?? | v0 = | 38 m/s |
First method …
The hard way to solve this problem is to do it the way that many students think is the easy way. That is, the "plug and chug" method shown in the previous examples. This method appears easy since it requires very little thought, but it turns out to be quite demanding.
First, convert to SI units.
| 60 mile | 1609 m | 1 hour | = 26.8 | m | ||
| 1 hour | 1 mile | 3600 s | s | |||
| 30 mile | 1609 m | 1 hour | = 13.4 | m | ||
| 1 hour | 1 mile | 3600 s | s | |||
| 20 mile | 1609 m | 1 hour | = 8.94 | m | ||
| 1 hour | 1 mile | 3600 s | s | |||
| 10 mile | 1609 m | 1 hour | = 4.47 | m | ||
| 1 hour | 1 mile | 3600 s | s |
| 144 feet | 1 mile | 1609 m | = 43.9 m | ||
| 1 | 5280 feet | 1 mile | |||
Then, calculate acceleration from the data for 60 mph.
| v0 = | 26.8 m/s | v2 = | v02 + 2aΔx | ||
| v = | 0 m/s | a = | v2 − v02 | ||
| Δx = | 43.9 m | 2Δx | |||
| a = | ?? | a = | −(26.8 m/s)2 | ||
| 2(43.9 m) | |||||
| a = | −8.18 m/s2 |
Now, calculate the distances for the other speeds.
| v2 = | v02 + 2aΔx | Δx = | −(13.4 m/s)2 | = 11.0 m | ||||||
| 2(−8.18 m/s2) | ||||||||||
| Δx = | v2 − v02 | = | − v02 | Δx = | −(8.94 m/s)2 | = 4.89 m | ||||
| 2a | 2a | 2(−8.18 m/s2) | ||||||||
| Δx = | −(4.47 m/s)2 | = 1.22 m | ||||||||
| 2(−8.18 m/s2) | ||||||||||
And finally, convert back into English units.
| 11.0 m | 1 mile | 5280 feet | = 36 feet | ||
| 1 | 1609 m | 1 mile | |||
| 4.89 m | 1 mile | 5280 feet | = 16 feet | ||
| 1 | 1609 m | 1 mile | |||
| 1.22 m | 1 mile | 5280 feet | = 4 feet | ||
| 1 | 1609 m | 1 mile |
Second method …
Standard problem solving techniques work, but they're a monumental waste of time in this case. Any small error would destroy the answers and waste personal mental energy as well — something we all like to avoid. The easy way to solve this problem does not involve any trickery. It requires that you identify and understand the key concepts needed to solve the problem. Halfway through the mass of equations, an important assumption was made. It was assumed that the braking acceleration of the car would remain constant for all initial velocities. This problem is then one of determining the relationship between displacement and velocity. The equation that does this is
v2 = v02 + 2a(x − x0)
which shows that displacement is proportional to velocity squared when acceleration is constant and either the the initial or final velocity is zero.
x ∝ v2
In this problem we're comparing stopping distances at 30, 20, and 10 mph to those at 60 mph. The square of the ratios of the new velocity to the original velocity will be the ratio of the new stopping distances to the original stopping distance.
| The Easier Way to Solve This Problem | ||
| ratio of new velocity to original velocity |
ratio of new distance to original distance |
new stopping distance |
|---|---|---|
| 30 mph/60 mph = 1/2 | (1/2)2 = 1/4 | (1/4) 144 feet = 36 feet |
| 20 mph/60 mph = 1/3 | (1/3)2 = 1/9 | (1/9) 144 feet = 16 feet |
| 10 mph/60 mph = 1/6 | (1/6)2 = 1/36 | (1/36) 144 feet = 4 feet |
These are exactly the answers we got after doing all the brainless "plug and chug" calculating of the hard method. Isn't it wonderful to have a brain.
| v0 = | 0 m/s | a = | Δv | = | 90 m/s | |
| v = | 180 kts ≈ 90 m/s | Δt | 30 s | |||
| t = | 30 s | a = | 3 m/s2 ≈ ⅓ g | |||
| a = | ?? | |||||
| v0 = | 0 m/s | s = | s0 + v0t + ½at2 |
| v = | 180 kts ≈ 90 m/s | s = | ½(3 m/s2)(30 s)2 |
| t = | 30 s | s = | 1350 m |
| a = | 3 m/s2 | ||
| s = | ?? | ||
| v0 = | 0 m/s | s = | vt = ½(v + v0)t |
| v = | 180 kts ≈ 90 m/s | s = | ½(90 m/s + 0 m/s)(30 m/s) |
| t = | 30 s | s = | 1350 m |
| s = | ?? | ||